*****OBBBA is a very comprehensive tax with many changes affecting individuals and
businesses. Each client has different needs and needs various interpretations If desired, we
would be pleased to perform the requisite research and provide you with a detailed written
analysis or meeting. Such an engagement is not part of our tax preparation fees and we
would be happy to quote a fee for this service.****

On July 4, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law.This followed July 1 passage in the Senate and July 3 passage in the House. Enactment follows days of frantic activity in Congress, with day-long debates, record-setting voting sessions, and many deals to secure passage in the closely divided House and Senate.

COMMENT: One of the final changes to the bill before passage was to strip the name of the Act due to Senate reconciliation rules, so the official name is not the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This has been done for other recent reconciliation bills, such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

The Act includes a number of tax changes, including permanent and limited modification of many soon-to-expire tax provisions, new provisions promised by President Trump during his 2024 campaign, elimination or modification of most green energy provisions, and dozens of other changes affecting individuals and businesses. There are many differences outside the tax provisions that have been subject to disagreement within the GOP majority, though the dissenting voices seem to have accepted those changes in order to get the bill across the finish line.

Upon its passage, the majority of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) included expiration dates in order to satisfy budgetary requirements. Lower individual rate brackets, higher standard deductions, the elimination of the personal exemption, the cap on the deduction of state and local taxes (SALT), changes to the alternative minimum tax, and many other provisions are all set to expire at the end of 2025. Without legislation, the federal tax system would have largely reverted back to the rules applicable in 2017.

Throughout the 2024 campaign, Trump, as well as many GOP lawmakers, proposed making these soon-to-expire provisions a permanent part of the tax code. The Act does just that, but it comes at a high price tag (some estimates have it at $5 trillion over ten years). Much of this cost is balanced by reduced outlays in many government programs not related to taxation, and by the elimination of many of the "green" tax provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act.

COMMENT: This CCH Tax Briefing is not intended to comprehensively cover all provisions proposed in the approximately 400-page tax portion of the Act, but rather the highlights. See CCH® AnswerConnect for complete coverage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

EXTENDED INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS

Individual Extenders

Many of the provisions of the TCJA applicable to individuals are among those scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.

These include:

• 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35 and 37 percent brackets applicable since 2018;

• Elimination of personal exemptions;

• Increased alternative minimum tax exemption and threshold amounts;

• Lower limitation on the deduction of mortgage interest;

• Limitation on the casualty loss deduction;

• Termination of the miscellaneous itemized deduction; and

• Allowance of rollovers from qualified tuition programs to ABLE accounts.

The Act makes all of these provisions permanent, but does make some modifications. The Act permanently treats mortgage insurance premiums as qualified residence interest for which a deduction could be claimed and allows for unreimbursed educator expenses to be deducted as a miscellaneous itemized deduction. The Act also removes the last seven years of inflation adjustments from the AMT exemption phase-out threshold for joint filers, reverting the threshold to the 2018 amount.

COMMENT: Between 2008 and 2021, mortgage insurance premiums could be treated as qualined residence interest and deducted my homeowners. Also, under current law, teachers are allowed an above-the-line deduction for classroom expenses of up to $300 for 2024 and 2025, but the Act expands that beyond the dollar limitation.

Also, the Act does permanently eliminate the personal exemption amount, but provides a $6,000 deduction amount for seniors age 65 and older after 2024 and before 2029. This deduction would phase out for individuals whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 for joint filers).

COMMENT: A similar provision was in the House-passed version of the bill, but was instead an expansion of the standard deduction, and capped at $4,000.

Standard Deduction

The TCJA nearly doubled the standard deduction for tax years beginning after 2017. For 2025 (prior to the Act), the inflation adjusted amounts were $30,000 for joint filers, $22,500 for heads of households, and $15,000 for single taxpayers and married taxpayers filing separately. These higher amounts were set to expire after 2025.

The Act increases the amount of the standard deduction for tax years beginning in 2025 and subject to inflation thereafter. Under the Act, the standard deduction amounts for 2025 are $31,500 for joint filers $23,625 for heads of households, and $15,750 for single taxpayers and married taxpayers filing separately.

COMMENT: In the bill passed by the House, the amounts would have been temporarily increased for tax years 2025 through 2028 by $2,000, $1,500, and $1,000 respectively. The bill originally proposed by the Senate also increased the deduction by the same amounts, but made them permanent and subject to inflation. The lower amounts ultimately passed reflect an attempt to lower the cost of the provision.

SALT Deduction

One of the most controversial provisions of the CJA was the imposition of a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes. Before the ink was dry on the 2017 legislation, lawmakers in higher tax states on both sides of the aisle (the so-called "SALT Caucus") were introducing legislation intended to increase or outright repeal the cap.

The Act increases the cap to $40,000 for 2025, with a one percent increase in the cap each year through 2029 before returning to the $10,000 limit in 2030. The cap is reduced by 30% of the amount by which the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds a threshold amount. That threshold amount is generally $500,000 for 2025, with a one percent increase each year through 2029.

COMMENT: This had proven to be one of the stickier points for legislators in their negotiations in both the House and Senate. Members of the SALT Caucus were still outwardly unhappy with the $40,000 limit agreed to in the House bill, but ultimately decided to vote in favor of it. The initial Senate proposal made no increase in the cap, but was eventually increased to match the House bill. In the days leading up to passage in the Senate, members of the SALT Caucus have accepted this final framework.

Child Tax Credit

The TCJA increased the amount of the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 for tax years 2018 through 2025, as well as nearly quadrupling the phaseout thresholds to $400,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for other filers.

The Act permanently increases the base amount of the credit to $2,200, subject to annual inflation increases. The post-2017 base amount of the refundable portion of the child tax credit (the "additional child tax credit") remains at $1,400, and continues to be adjusted for inflation ($1,700 for 2025).

The Act requires the taxpayer claiming the credit, the taxpayer's spouse (if married), and the child for whom the credit is claimed to have Social Security numbers.

Estate Taxes

The estate tax basic exclusion amount, which the TCJA doubled for decedents dying through 2025 (inflation adjusted to $13.99 million in 2025) would revert back to 2017 amounts if the TCJA is allowed to expire.

Under the Act, the basic exclusion amount is increased again to a base amount of $15 million for decedents dying in 2026, adjusted for inflation thereafter.

COMMENT: The $15 million amount is probably not far off from where inflation would have taken the exclusion amount for 2026 if the TCJA was not scheduled to expire.

NEW INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS

No Tax on Tips

One of the big talking points for President Trump during the campaign was the elimination of the tax on tip income. Historically, tip income was not subject to tax until the early 1980s when legislation passed during the Reagan administration treated it like regular income. The deduction is capped at $25,000, and the deduction begins to phase out when the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction is not allowed for tax years beginning after 2028. The Act also extends the employer credit for Social Security taxes on employee cash tips to the beauty service industry (the credit currently only applies to the food and beverage industry).

No Tax on Overtime

During his campaign, President Trump also proposed making overtime compensation tax free. Under the Act, taxpayers are able to claim a deduction for the amount of overtime pay received as required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Like the deduction for tip income, taxpayers do not have to itemize deductions to claim the deduction, but are required to provide a Social Security number. The deduction is capped at $12,500 ($25,000 for joint filers), and the deduction begins to phase out when the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction is not allowed for tax years beginning after 2028.

COMMENT: The Act does not provide extensive rules for the application of this provision, leaving the rules of application up to Treasury Regulations.

Social Security Income

During his campaign, President Trump also proposed making Social Security income tax free. However, at no point has the Senate bill, nor the version that passed the House, included a provision to eliminate the tax on or provide a deduction for Social Security income.

COMMENT: It is possible that the special personal exemption available for seniors is intended to accomplish the same goal as making Social Security income tax-free.

Itemized Deduction Limitation

Prior to the TCJA, the itemized deduction limitation was subject to a phaseout at higher incomes (the "Pease" limitation). The Act includes a return of the limitation on itemized deductions for taxpayers in the 37 percent income tax bracket, effective after 2025.

Automobile Loan Interest

Previously, interest on an individual's automobile loan was treated as nondeductible personal interest. The Act includes a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on an automobile loan in 2025 through 2028 for a car purchased after 2024. The deduction is available for both itemizers and non-itemizers.

Trump Accounts

The Act also includes provisions for the creation of tax-favored accounts for newborn children, called "Trump Accounts." The accounts are seeded with $1,000 for newborn children. From a tax standpoint, they operate under rules similar to those applicable to individual retirement accounts, but are available to children.

Additional Provisions

The Act also includes:

• A tax credit for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations;

• An expansion of 529 programs to include elementary, secondary, and home schooling expenses; and

• The resurrection of the COVID-era allowance of a charitable contribution deduction for non-itemizers.

BUSINESS PROVISIONS

Bonus Depreciation

The TCJA provided for 100 percent expensing of certain business property through 2022, with a 20 percent stepdown each year after before reaching 0 percent in 2027 (currently set at 40% in 2025). The Act makes 100 percent bonus depreciation permanent for property acquired after January 19, 2025.

Research and Experimental Expenditures

Under prior law, taxpayers are required to amortize research and experimental expenditures. Prior to 2022, a direct expense election was available. The Act permanently reinstates the deduction for domestic research and experimental expenditure costs incurred after 2024. Taxpayers can elect whether to deduct or amortize the expenditures, though the requirement to amortize under prior law is suspended while the deduction is available. Additionally, small businesses with average annual gross receipts of $31 million or less would be able to elect to claim the deduction retroactively to 2022.

Qualified Business Income Deduction

The TCJA's qualified business income deduction under Code Sec. 199A is set to expire for tax years beginning after 2025.

Under the Act, the qualified business income deduction is made permanent. Additional changes expand qualification for the deduction.

Additional Provisions

The Act also includes:

• An increase in the 179 deduction limitations after 2024

• An exclusion of interest received by qualified lenders secured by rural or agricultural real property

• Modifications to the low-income housing credit.International Extensions

The Act makes permanent many international and foreign-related provisions under the CJA, including the:

• Deduction for foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) and global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI); and

• Base erosion minimum tax amount.

However, the Act changes the FDIl rate to 33.34 percent (currently 37.5 percent) and the GILTI rate to 40 percent (currently 50 percent) after 2025.

COMMENT: Under TCJA, these rates were scheduled to drop to 21.875 percent and 37.5 percent, respectively, after 2025. So this actually represents a tax increase for 2026 and beyond. The Act also changes the base erosion minimum tax amount to 10.5 percent from its current 10 percent rate after 2025.COMMENT. Under TCJA, this rate was scheduled to increase to 12.5 percent after 2025, so this represents a tax decrease for 2026 and beyond. The Act also makes changes to the treatment of "tested" CFC income and the foreign tax credit.

GREEN ENERGY TERMINATIONS

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 created dozens of new tax credits intended to promote the manufacture and adoption of alternative energy sources. The elimination of these credits by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a key method of paying for many of the new taxpayer-friendly provisions. However, the timing of the termination had been another sticking point throughout negotiations, and as the Senate amended its bill, House leaders were pleading for changes to be included to look more like the House bill.

The major difference between the two chambers largely centered on when credits for "clean" energy producers will be eliminated. The House took the approach that for producers that have already invested in construction costs, the credits should be terminated in 2026 or later.The Senate initially took a much more aggressive approach, with some credits terminating immediately but nearly all terminating before the end of 2025.

Ultimately, the Senate relented and included a longer run-out for energy producers to claim credits, in some cases allowing for construction to begin in 2026.

Where the Senate Act did agree with the House was on the termination of many credits applicable to the consumer side of green energy. Under the Act, the affected credits include the following (termination generally after 2025):

• Previously owned clean vehicle credit;

• Clean vehicle credit;

• Qualified commercial clean vehice credit;

• Alternative fuel refueling property credit;

• Energy efficient home improvement credit;

• Residential clean energy credit; and

• New energy efficient home credit.

IRS PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS

Perhaps the most widely applicable operations provision of the Act is the termination of the IRS Direct File program.

The Act requires the termination of the program within 30 days after passage and appropriates funding for the IRS to research a public-private partnership to replace the current "free file" program.The Act includes specified penalties for fraudulent promoters of retention credit schemes, but at a much lower limit of $1,000 per failure to comply with due diligence requirements (though without a cumulative limit). The Act also includes the termination of the Direct File program.

COMMENT: The version of the bill that was passed by the House included the provision imposing the penalty on ERC promoters with much higher penalty amounts. However, in a subsequent vote on a recissions bill on June 11, a rule adopted in passage struck that provision from the House-passed bill. It isn't clear how that recissions bill will impact this provision.

The U.S. Tax Court lacks jurisdiction over a taxpayer’s appeal of a levy in a collection due process hearing when the IRS abandoned its levy because it applied the taxpayer’s later year overpayments to her earlier tax liability, eliminating the underpayment on which the levy was based. The 8-1 ruling by the Court resolves a split between the Third Circuit and the Fourth and D.C. Circuit.

The U.S. Tax Court lacks jurisdiction over a taxpayer’s appeal of a levy in a collection due process hearing when the IRS abandoned its levy because it applied the taxpayer’s later year overpayments to her earlier tax liability, eliminating the underpayment on which the levy was based. The 8-1 ruling by the Court resolves a split between the Third Circuit and the Fourth and D.C. Circuit.

The IRS determined that taxpayer had a tax liability for 2010 and began a levy procedure. The taxpayer appealed the levy in a collection due process hearing, and then appealed that adverse result in the Tax Court. The taxpayer asserted that she did not have an underpayment in 2010 because her then-husband had made $50,000 of estimated tax payments for 2010 with instructions that the amounts be applied to the taxpayer’s separate 2010 return. The IRS instead applied the payments to the husband’s separate account. While the agency and Tax Court proceedings were pending, the taxpayer filed several tax returns reflecting overpayments, which she wanted refunded to her. The IRS instead applied the taxpayer’s 2013-2016 and 2019 tax overpayments to her 2010 tax debt.

When the IRS had applied enough of the taxpayer’s later overpayments to extinguish her 2010 liability, the IRS moved to dismiss the Tax Court proceeding as moot, asserting that the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction because the IRS no longer had a basis to levy. The Tax Court agreed. The taxpayer appealed to the Third Circuit, which held for the taxpayer that the IRS’s abandonment of the levy did not moot the Tax Court proceedings. The IRS appealed to the Supreme Court, which reversed the Third Circuit.

The Court, in an opinion written by Justice Barrett in which seven other justices joined, held that the Tax Court, as a court of limited jurisdiction, only has jurisdiction under Code Sec. 6330(d)(1) to review a determination of an appeals officer in a collection due process hearing when the IRS is pursuing a levy. Once the IRS applied later overpayments to zero out the taxpayer’s liability and abandoned the levy process, the Tax Court no longer had jurisdiction over the case. Justice Gorsuch dissented, pointing out that the Court’s decision leaves the taxpayer without any resolution of the merits of her 2010 tax liability, and “hands the IRS a powerful new tool to avoid accountability for its mistakes in future cases like this one.”

Zuch, SCt

The Internal Revenue Service collected more than $5.1 trillion in gross receipts in fiscal year 2024. It is the first time the agency broke the $5 trillion mark, according to the 2024 Data Book, an annual publication that reviews IRS activities for the given fiscal year.

The Internal Revenue Service collected more than $5.1 trillion in gross receipts in fiscal year 2024.

It is the first time the agency broke the $5 trillion mark, according to the 2024 Data Book, an annual publication that reviews IRS activities for the given fiscal year. It was an increase over the $4.7 trillion collected in the previous fiscal year.

Individual tax, employment taxes, and real estate and trust income taxes accounted for $4.4 trillion of the fiscal 2024 gross collections, with the balance of $565 billion coming from businesses. The agency issued $120.1 billion in refunds, including $117.6 billion in individual income tax refunds and $428.4 billion in refunds to businesses.

The 2024 Data Book broke out statistics from the pilot year of the Direct File program, noting that 423,450 taxpayers logged into Direct File, with 140,803 using the program, which allows users to prepare and file their tax returns through the IRS website, to have their tax returns filed and accepted by the agency. Of the returns filed, 72 percent received a refund, with approximately $90 million in refunds issued to Direct File users. The IRS had gross collections of nearly $35.3 million (24 percent of filers using Direct File). The rest had a return with a $0 balance due.

Among the data highlighted in this year’s publication were service level improvements.

"The past two filing seasons saw continued improvement in IRS levels of service—one the phone, in person, and online—thanks to the efforts of our workforce and our use of long-term resources provided by Congress," IRS Acting Commissioner Michael Faulkender wrote. "In FY 2024, our customer service representatives answered approximately 20 million live phone calls. At our Taxpayer Assistance Centers around the country, we had more than 2 million contacts, increasing the in-person help we provided to taxpayers nearly 26 percent compared to FY 2023."

On the compliance side, the IRS reported in the 2024 Data Book that for all returns filed for Tax Years 2014 through 2022, the agency "has examined 0.40 percent of individual returns filed and 0.66 percent of corporation returns filed, as of the end of fiscal year 2024."

This includes examination of 7.9 percent of taxpayers filing individual returns reporting total positive incomes of $10 million or more. The IRS collected $29.0 billion from the 505,514 audits that were closed in FY 2024.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

IR-2025-63

The IRS has released guidance listing the specific changes in accounting method to which the automatic change procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, I.R.B. 2015- 5, 419, apply. The latest guidance updates and supersedes the current list of automatic changes found in Rev. Proc. 2024-23, I.R.B. 2024-23.

The IRS has released guidance listing the specific changes in accounting method to which the automatic change procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, I.R.B. 2015- 5, 419, apply. The latest guidance updates and supersedes the current list of automatic changes found in Rev. Proc. 2024-23, I.R.B. 2024-23.

Significant changes to the list of automatic changes made by this revenue procedure to Rev. Proc. 2024-23 include:

• (1) Section 6.22, relating to late elections under § 168(j)(8), § 168(l)(3)(D), and § 181(a)(1), is removed because the section is obsolete;
• (2) The following paragraphs, relating to the § 481(a) adjustment, are clarified by adding the phrase “for any taxable year in which the election was made” to the second sentence: (a) Paragraph (2) of section 3.07, relating to wireline network asset maintenance allowance and units of property methods of accounting under Rev. Proc. 2011-27; (b) Paragraph (2) of section 3.08, relating to wireless network asset maintenance allowance and units of property methods of accounting under Rev. Proc. 2011-28; and (c) Paragraph (3)(a) of section 3.11, relating to cable network asset capitalization methods of accounting under Rev. Proc. 2015-12;
• (3) Section 6.04, relating to a change in general asset account treatment due to a change in the use of MACRS property, is modified to remove section 6.04(2)(b), providing a temporary waiver of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(1)(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, because the provision is obsolete;
• (4) Section 6.05, relating to changes in method of accounting for depreciation due to a change in the use of MACRS property, is modified to remove section 6.05(2) (b), providing a temporary waiver of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(1)(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, because the provision is obsolete;
• (5) Section 6.13, relating to the disposition of a building or structural component (§ 168; § 1.168(i)-8), is clarified by adding the parenthetical “including the taxable year immediately preceding the year of change” to sections 6.13(3)(b), (c), (d), and (e), regarding certain covered changes under section 6.13;
• (6) Section 6.14, relating to dispositions of tangible depreciable assets (other than a building or its structural components) (§ 168; § 1.168(i)-8), is clarified by adding the parenthetical “including the taxable year immediately preceding the year of change” to sections 6.14(3)(b), (c), (d), and (e), regarding certain covered changes under section 6.14; June 9, 2025 1594 Bulletin No. 2025–24;
• (7) Section 7.01, relating to changes in method of accounting for SRE expenditures, is modified as follows. First, to remove section 7.01(3)(a), relating to changes in method of accounting for SRE expenditures for a year of change that is the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, because the provision is obsolete. Second, newly redesignated section 7.01(3)(a) (formerly section 7.01(3)(b)) is modified to remove the references to a year of change later than the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, because the language is obsolete;
• (8) Section 12.14, relating to interest capitalization, is modified to provide under section 12.14(1)(b) that the change under section 12.14 does not apply to a taxpayer that wants to change its method of accounting for interest to apply either: (1) current §§ 1.263A-11(e)(1)(ii) and (iii); or (2) proposed §§ 1.263A-8(d)(3) and 1.263A-11(e) and (f) (REG-133850-13), as published on May 15, 2024 (89 FR 42404) and corrected on July 24, 2024 (89 FR 59864);
• (9) Section 15.01, relating to a change in overall method to an accrual method from the cash method or from an accrual method with regard to purchases and sales of inventories and the cash method for all other items, is modified by removing the first sentence of section 15.01(5), disregarding any prior overall accounting method change to the cash method implemented using the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2001-10, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2011- 14, or Rev. Proc. 2002-28, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2011-14, for purposes of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(e) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, because the language is obsolete;
• (10) Section 15.08, relating to changes from the cash method to an accrual method for specific items, is modified to add new section 15.08(1)(b)(ix) to provide that the change under section 15.08 does not apply to a change in the method of accounting for any foreign income tax as defined in § 1.901-2(a);
• (11) Section 15.12, relating to farmers changing to the cash method, is clarified to provide that the change under section 15.12 is only applicable to a taxpayer’s trade or business of farming and not applicable to a non-farming trade or business the taxpayer might be engaged in;
• (11) Section 12.01, relating to certain uniform capitalization (UNICAP) methods used by resellers and reseller-producers, is modified as follows. First, to provide that section 12.01 applies to a taxpayer that uses a historic absorption ratio election with the simplified production method, the modified simplified production method, or the simplified resale method and wants to change to a different method for determining the additional Code Sec. 263A costs that must be capitalized to ending inventories or other eligible property on hand at the end of the taxable year (that is, to a different simplified method or a facts-and-circumstances method). Second, to remove the transition rule in section 12.01(1)(b)(ii)(B) because this language is obsolete;
• (12) Section 15.13, relating to nonshareholder contributions to capital under § 118, is modified to require changes under section 15.13(1)(a)(ii), relating to a regulated public utility under § 118(c) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (Dec. 22, 2017)) (“former § 118(c)”) that wants to change its method of accounting to exclude from gross income payments or the fair market value of property received that are contributions in aid of construction under former § 118(c), to be requested under the non-automatic change procedures provided in Rev. Proc. 2015- 13. Specifically, section 15.13(1)(a)(i), relating to a regulated public utility under former § 118(c) that wants to change its method of accounting to include in gross income payments received from customers as connection fees that are not contributions to the capital of the taxpayer under former § 118(c), is removed. Section 15.13(1)(a)(ii), relating to a regulated public utility under former § 118(c) that wants to change its method of accounting to exclude from gross income payments or the fair market value of property received that are contributions in aid of construction under former § 118(c), is removed. Section 15.13(2), relating to the inapplicability of the change under section 15.13(1) (a)(ii), is removed. Section 15.13(1)(b), relating to a taxpayer that wants to change its method of accounting to include in gross income payments or the fair market value of property received that do not constitute contributions to the capital of the taxpayer within the meaning of § 118 and the regulations thereunder, is modified by removing “(other than the payments received by a public utility described in former § 118(c) that are addressed in section 15.13(1)(a)(i) of this revenue procedure)” because a change under section 15.13(1)(a)(i) may now be made under newly redesignated section 15.13(1) of this revenue procedure;
• (13) Section 16.08, relating to changes in the timing of income recognition under § 451(b) and (c), is modified as follows. First, section 16.08 is modified to remove section 16.08(5)(a), relating to the temporary waiver of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(1)(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 for certain changes under section 16.08, because the provision is obsolete. Second, section 16.08 is modified to remove section 16.08(4)(a)(iv), relating to special § 481(a) adjustment rules when the temporary eligibility waiver applies, because the provision is obsolete. Third, section 16.08 is modified to remove sections 16.08(4)(a) (v)(C) and 16.08(4)(a)(v)(D), providing examples to illustrate the special § 481(a) adjustment rules under section 16.08(4)(a) (iv), because the examples are obsolete;
• (14) Section 19.01, relating to changes in method of accounting for certain exempt long-term construction contracts from the percentage-of-completion method of accounting to an exempt contract method described in § 1.460-4(c), or to stop capitalizing costs under § 263A for certain home construction contracts, is modified by removing the references to “proposed § 1.460-3(b)(1)(ii)” in section 19.01(1), relating to the inapplicability of the change under section 19.01, because the references are obsolete;
• (15) Section 19.02, relating to changes in method of accounting under § 460 to rely on the interim guidance provided in section 8 of Notice 2023-63, 2023-39 I.R.B. 919, is modified to remove section 19.02(3)(a), relating to a change in the treatment of SRE expenditures under § 460 for the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, because the provision is obsolete;
• (16) Section 20.07, relating to changes in method of accounting for liabilities for rebates and allowances to the recurring item exception under § 461(h)(3), is clarified by adding new section 20.07(1)(b) (ii), providing that a change under section 20.07 does not apply to liabilities arising from reward programs;
• (17) The following sections, relating to the inapplicability of the relevant change, are modified to remove the reference to “proposed § 1.471-1(b)” because this reference is obsolete: (a) Section 22.01(2), relating to cash discounts; (b) Section 22.02(2), relating to estimating inventory “shrinkage”; (c) Section 22.03(2), relating to qualifying volume-related trade discounts; (d) Section 22.04(1)(b)(iii), relating to impermissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories; (e) Section 22.05(1)(b)(ii), relating to the core alternative valuation method; Bulletin No. 2025–24 1595 June 9, 2025 (f) Section 22.06(2), relating to replacement cost for automobile dealers’ parts inventory; (g) Section 22.07(2), relating to replacement cost for heavy equipment dealers’ parts inventory; (h) Section 22.08(2), relating to rotable spare parts; (i) Section 22.09(3), relating to the advanced trade discount method; (j) Section 22.10(1)(b)(iii), relating to permissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories; (k) Section 22.11(2), relating to a change in the official used vehicle guide utilized in valuing used vehicles; (l) Section 22.12(2), relating to invoiced advertising association costs for new vehicle retail dealerships; (m) Section 22.13(2), relating to the rolling-average method of accounting for inventories; (n) Section 22.14(2), relating to sales-based vendor chargebacks; (o) Section 22.15(2), relating to certain changes to the cost complement of the retail inventory method; (p) Section 22.16(2), relating to certain changes within the retail inventory method; and (q) Section 22.17(1)(b)(iii), relating to changes from currently deducting inventories to permissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories; and
• (18) Section 22.10, relating to permissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories, is modified to remove section 22.10(1)(d).

Subject to a transition rule, this revenue procedure is effective for a Form 3115 filed on or after June 9, 2025, for a year of change ending on or after October 31, 2024, that is filed under the automatic change procedures of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, 2015-5 I.R.B. 419, as clarified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2015-33, 2015-24 I.R.B. 1067, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2021-34, 2021-35 I.R.B. 337, Rev. Proc. 2021-26, 2021-22 I.R.B. 1163, Rev. Proc. 2017-59, 2017-48 I.R.B. 543, and section 17.02(b) and (c) of Rev. Proc. 2016-1, 2016-1 I.R.B. 1 .

Rev. Proc. 2025-23

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued Notice 2025-33, extending and modifying transition relief for brokers required to report digital asset transactions using Form 1099-DA, Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions. The notice builds upon the temporary relief previously provided in Notice 2024-56 and allows additional time for brokers to comply with reporting requirements.

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued Notice 2025-33, extending and modifying transition relief for brokers required to report digital asset transactions using Form 1099-DA, Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions. The notice builds upon the temporary relief previously provided in Notice 2024-56 and allows additional time for brokers to comply with reporting requirements.

Reporting Requirements and Transitional Relief

In 2024, final regulations were issued requiring brokers to report digital asset sale and exchange transactions on Form 1099-DA, furnish payee statements, and backup withhold on certain transactions beginning January 1, 2025. Notice 2024-56 provided general transitional relief, including limited relief from backup withholding for certain sales of digital assets during 2026 for brokers using the IRS’s TIN-matching system in place of certified TINs.

Additional Transition Relief from Backup Withholding, Customers Not Previously Classified as U.S. Persons

Under Notice 2025-33, transition relief from backup withholding tax liability and associated penalties is extended for any broker that fails to withhold and pay the backup withholding tax for any digital asset sale or exchange transaction effected during calendar year 2026.

Brokers will not be required to backup withhold for any digital asset sale or exchange transactions effected in 2027 when they verify customer information through the IRS Tax Information Number (TIN) Matching Program. To qualify, brokers must submit a customer's name and tax identification number to the matching service and receive confirmation that the information corresponds with IRS records.

Additionally, penalties that apply to brokers that fail to withhold and pay the full backup withholding due are limited with respect to any decrease in the value of received digital assets between the time of the transaction giving rise to the backup withholding obligation and the time the broker liquidates 24 percent of a customer’s received digital assets.

Finally, the notice also provides additional transition relief for brokers for sales of digital assets effected during calendar year 2027 for certain preexisting customers. This relief applies when brokers have not previously classified these customers as U.S. persons and the customer files contain only non-U.S. residence addresses.

Notice 2025-33

IR-2025-67

The IRS failed to establish that it issued a valid notice of deficiency to an individual under Code Sec. 6212(b). Thus, the Tax Court dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction.

The IRS failed to establish that it issued a valid notice of deficiency to an individual under Code Sec. 6212(b). Thus, the Tax Court dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction.

The taxpayer filed a petition to seek re-determination of a deficiency for the tax year at issue. The IRS moved to dismiss the petition under Code Sec. 6213(a), contending that it was untimely and that Code Sec. 7502’s "timely mailed, timely filed" rule did not apply. However, the Court determined that the notice of deficiency had not been properly addressed to the individual’s last known address.

Although the individual attached a copy of the notice to the petition, the Court found that the significant 400-day delay in filing did not demonstrate timely, actual receipt sufficient to cure the defect. Because the IRS could not establish that a valid notice was issued, the Court concluded that the 90-day deadline under Code Sec. 6213(a) was never triggered, and Code Sec. 7502 was inapplicable.

L.C.I. Cano, TC Memo. 2025-65, Dec. 62,679(M)

A limited partnership classified as a TEFRA partnership was not entitled to exclude its limited partners’ distributive shares from net earnings from self-employment under Code Sec. 1402(a)(13). The Tax Court found that the individuals materially participated in the partnership’s investment management business and were not acting as limited partners “as such.”

A limited partnership classified as a TEFRA partnership was not entitled to exclude its limited partners’ distributive shares from net earnings from self-employment under Code Sec. 1402(a)(13). The Tax Court found that the individuals materially participated in the partnership’s investment management business and were not acting as limited partners “as such.”

Furthermore, the Court concluded that the limited partners’ roles were indistinguishable from those of active general partners. Accordingly, their distributive shares were includible in net earnings from self-employment under Code Sec. 1402(a) and subject to tax under Code Sec. 1401. The taxpayer’s argument that the partners’ actions were authorized solely through the general partner was found unpersuasive. The Court emphasized substance over form and found that the partners’ conduct and economic relationship with the firm were determinative.

Additionally, the Court held that the taxpayer failed to meet the requirements under Code Sec. 7491(a) to shift the burden of proof because it did not establish compliance with substantiation and net worth requirements. Lastly, the Tax Court also upheld the IRS’s designation of the general partner LLC as the proper tax matters partner under Code Sec. 6231(a)(7)(B), finding that the attempted designation of a limited partner was invalid because an eligible general partner existed and had the legal authority to serve.

Soroban Capital Partners LP, TC Memo. 2025-52, Dec. 62,665(M)

The 2025 cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that affect pension plan dollar limitations and other retirement-related provisions have been released by the IRS. In general, many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2025 because the increase in the cost-of-living index due to inflation met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment. However, other limitations will remain unchanged.

The IRS reminded individual retirement arrangement (IRA) owners aged 70½ and older that they can make tax-free charitable donations of up to $105,000 in 2024 through qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), up from $100,000 in past years. 

The IRS reminded individual retirement arrangement (IRA) owners aged 70½ and older that they can make tax-free charitable donations of up to $105,000 in 2024 through qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), up from $100,000 in past years. For those aged 73 or older, QCDs also count toward the year's required minimum distribution (RMD). Following are the steps for reporting and documenting QCDs for 2024:

• IRA trustees issue Form 1099-R, Distributions from Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., in early 2025 documenting IRA distributions.
• Record the full amount of any IRA distribution on Line 4a of Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or Form 1040-SR, U.S. Tax Return for Seniors.
• Enter "0" on Line 4b if the entire amount qualifies as a QCD, marking it accordingly.
• Obtain a written acknowledgment from the charity, confirming the contribution date, amount, and that no goods or services were received.

Additionally, to ensure QCDs for 2024 are processed by year-end, IRA owners should contact their trustee soon. Each eligible IRA owner can exclude up to $105,000 in QCDs from taxable income. Married couples, if both meet qualifications and have separate IRAs, can donate up to $210,000 combined. QCDs did not require itemizing deductions. New this year, the QCD limit was subject to annual adjustments based on inflation. For 2025, the limit rises to $108,000.

Further, for more details, see Publication 526, Charitable Contributions, and Publication 590-B, Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs).

IR-2024-289

For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.5 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.5 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

Wage Cap for Social Security Tax

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax on wages is 7.65 percent each for the employee and the employer. FICA tax has two components:

• a 6.2 percent social security tax, also known as old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI); and
• a 1.45 percent Medicare tax, also known as hospital insurance (HI).

For self-employed workers, the Self-Employment tax is 15.3 percent, consisting of:

• a 12.4 percent OASDI tax; and
• a 2.9 percent HI tax.

OASDI tax applies only up to a wage base, which includes most wages and self-employment income up to the annual wage cap.

For 2025, the wage base is $176,100. Thus, OASDI tax applies only to the taxpayer’s first $176,100 in wages or net earnings from self-employment. Taxpayers do not pay any OASDI tax on earnings that exceed $176,100.

There is no wage cap for HI tax.

Maximum Social Security Tax for 2025

For workers who earn $176,100 or more in 2025:

• an employee will pay a total of $10,918.20 in social security tax ($176,100 x 6.2 percent);
• the employer will pay the same amount; and
• a self-employed worker will pay a total of $21,836.40 in social security tax ($176,100 x 12.4 percent).

Additional Medicare Tax

Higher-income workers may have to pay an Additional Medicare tax of 0.9 percent. This tax applies to wages and self-employment income that exceed:

• $250,000 for married taxpayers who file a joint return;
• $125,000 for married taxpayers who file separate returns; and
• $200,000 for other taxpayers.

The annual wage cap does not affect the Additional Medicare tax.

Benefit Increase for 2025

Finally, a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will increase social security and SSI benefits for 2025 by 2.5 percent. The COLA is intended to ensure that inflation does not erode the purchasing power of these benefits.